Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than Motorola One Power, having an 87.1 score against 75.7. LG Velvet is a newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and thinner than Motorola One Power. LG Velvet features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet features a little bit better screen than Motorola One Power, because although it has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a bit larger screen. LG Velvet features a superior camera than Motorola One Power, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a much higher resolution back camera.
The LG Velvet features a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola One Power, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola One Power has superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.