Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the Motorola One Power, getting a global score of 86.6 against 75.7. The Galaxy A50s design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola One Power. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should offer very similar OS features.
The Galaxy A50s has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Power, because it has a bit higher pixel number in each display inch, a little bit larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little better processing power than Motorola One Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50s shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola One Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Power, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Motorola One Power counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.