Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola One Power, with a overall score of 90.8 against 75.7. The Galaxy A51 5G body is newer, a bit thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola One Power. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version while Motorola One Power has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a little faster processor than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Power, because it has a quite better display density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger display.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola One Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G has a superior camera than Motorola One Power, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Motorola One Power counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.