Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is slightly better than Motorola One Power's 75.7 global score. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note 5 is notably older than the Motorola One Power, it's construction is thinner and lighter.
Galaxy Note 5 has a better looking screen than Motorola One Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better count of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola One Power features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Power also has a greater number of cores.
Motorola One Power features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Power also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB. The Motorola One Power has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 5 captures clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Power, although it has a tinier camera aperture, they both have a 16 megapixels resolution camera, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.