Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-09-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Power's global score of 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition body is lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Power, even though it was released around a year before. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit better display than Motorola One Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better performance than Motorola One Power. They have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola One Power and the Galaxy Note Fan Edition have very similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have the same internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola One Power shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Power also counts with a way better resolution camera.
Motorola One Power has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.