Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Power's score of 75.7. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version while Motorola One Power has Android 10, so it provides the user some extra features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola One Power, even though it was released many years before.
The Motorola One Power features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit larger display, a little bit greater amount of pixels per display inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2246px resolution. Motorola One Power features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Power also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Power, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster). Motorola One Power takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Power also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a more mega-pixels camera.
The Motorola One Power has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.