Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Motorola One Power, with a general score of 93.6 against 75.7. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10. Even when the Galaxy S10 5G and the Motorola One Power were released with only 8 months difference, the Galaxy S10 5G is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better display than Motorola One Power, because it has a better 1440 x 3040 resolution, a quite greater pixel density and a bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Power, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy S10 5G has much more memory for applications and games than Motorola One Power, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola One Power features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.