Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Motorola One Power, having a 94.8 score against 75.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features and a performance increase. Galaxy S20's body is newer, thinner and extremely lighter than Motorola One Power.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola One Power, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little better processing power than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Motorola One Power, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 counts with a superior camera than Motorola One Power, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola One Power features longer battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.