Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is way better than Motorola One Power, having a overall score of 90.8 against 75.7. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version while Motorola One Power has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. The Galaxy S20 FE construction is extremely newer, a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Motorola One Power.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit sharper display than Motorola One Power, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite larger display.
Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Power, although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, they both have the same aperture. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Power, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Power has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.