Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Motorola One Power, having a score of 98 against 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than Motorola One Power, but it is just a bit heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better looking display than Motorola One Power, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better processing power than Motorola One Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola One Power, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola One Power, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to the Motorola One Power one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.