Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-09-24 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active is just a bit better than the Motorola One Power, getting a general score of 80.9 against 75.7. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S6 Active has a quite better hardware performance than Motorola One Power, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
Galaxy S6 Active features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Power features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal storage.
The Motorola One Power features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola One Power has a superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 MP resolution, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Power also has a larger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.