Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-09-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active has a global score of 75.8, which is a bit better than Motorola One Power's 75.7 general score. The Galaxy S7 Active design is a bit lighter than the Motorola One Power, but it's thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a brighter display than Motorola One Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher number of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola One Power counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a CPU that is very similar to the CPU in Motorola One Power, and although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), they both have the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One Power takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Power also counts with a much better 16 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola One Power counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.