Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than Motorola One Power, getting a general score of 78.1 against 75.7. Although the Galaxy S7 edge is extremely older than Motorola One Power, it's body is much lighter and somewhat thinner. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola One Power has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Power, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy S7 edge has a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Motorola One Power counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Motorola One Power features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39% more battery size.
The Motorola One Power and the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge both feature similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a camera with a lot worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.