Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the Motorola One Power, getting an 80.1 score against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is newer, but heavier and way thicker than Motorola One Power. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola One Power has Android 10.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Power. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better looking screen than Motorola One Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One Power, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Power takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much better video quality.
Motorola One Power features a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.