Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Motorola One Power, with an 81 score against 75.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the Motorola One Power, it is just a little bit heavier and thicker. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Power, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Power. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Power counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
The Motorola One Power and the Galaxy XCover Pro count with really similar cameras, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot more MP camera in the back and a larger camera aperture, they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.