Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Motorola One Power, getting an 88.5 score against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Power. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Motorola One Power has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better display than Motorola One Power, because it has a little bigger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better performance than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola One Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola One Power counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Power, although it has a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.