Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than Motorola One Power's global score of 75.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version while Motorola One Power has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and incredibly thinner than the Motorola One Power's, although it's extremely heavier.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better performing CPU than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Power, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Power, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Motorola One Power counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.