Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Motorola One Power, getting a 90.6 score against 75.7. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is noticeably heavier than the Motorola One Power, it's incredibly thinner and also a lot newer. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version while Motorola One Power has Android 10, providing you lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola One Power both have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a bigger display.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Power, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola One Power counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos and a camera with a much better 16 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola One Power has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.