Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than the Google Pixel, with an 80.7 score against 80.2. The Motorola One Vision is a a lot heavier phone than Google Pixel, but both are 0.34inches thick. Google Pixel features a display that is very similar to the Motorola One Vision one, because although the Google Pixel has a much smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola One Vision features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola One Vision has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Vision also has 4 more CPU cores.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a larger back camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola One Vision counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.