Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than Motorola One Vision, getting an 82.5 score against 80.7. Although Google Pixel 2 XL is older than Motorola One Vision, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
Motorola One Vision features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Vision. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Motorola One Vision counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a much more MP back-facing camera, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 1 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.