Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting an 80.7 score against 80. Motorola One Vision is a heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One Vision has a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision. They have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM.
The Motorola One Vision features superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One Vision captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.