Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision's overall score of 80.7. Even though the Google Pixel 3 XL and the Motorola One Vision were only released 7 months apart, the Google Pixel 3 XL body is just a bit thinner but also a bit heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better screen than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a just a little greater pixel density. The Motorola One Vision counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs, a way more MP back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Motorola One Vision features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a battery performance that's very similar to Motorola One Vision's battery performance, although the Google Pixel 3 XL has a 2 percent lower battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.