Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. The Motorola One Vision is a somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3a. Google Pixel 3a and Motorola One Vision count with similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
Motorola One Vision features just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Motorola One Vision features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Vision features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Motorola One Vision has a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 17 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.