Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, with an 80.7 score against 78.9. The Motorola One Vision is a better phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL, we must tell that it is also a just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone. Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a just a little better display density. Motorola One Vision captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Motorola One Vision features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 3a XL has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.