Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision, having an 82.9 score against 80.7. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is just a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than Motorola One Vision, and they were only released 5 months apart. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a little bit greater screen density. The Motorola One Vision has a superior camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Motorola One Vision has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 6% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.