Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision, getting an 82.9 score against 80.7. The Google Pixel 4a body is newer, notably lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Vision. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision counts with just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh. Motorola One Vision has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.