Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Motorola One Vision, having an 89 score against 80.7. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer device, and it's also just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola One Vision. Google Pixel 5 has a display that is very similar to Motorola One Vision's screen, although the Google Pixel 5 has a quite lower pixels amount per screen inch, a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola One Vision counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with improved battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.