Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 435 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is slightly better than the HTC One M9, getting a general score of 80.7 against 77.7. Motorola One Vision is a notably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the HTC One M9, although it's somewhat heavier. The HTC One M9 features a brighter screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
The Motorola One Vision has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. HTC One M9 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bit processing unit.
The Motorola One Vision features longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh. The Motorola One Vision has a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments, a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and a way more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.