Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| 2019-05-15 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a bit better than HTC U Ultra, having a general score of 80.7 against 77. Even though Motorola One Vision is incredibly newer than HTC U Ultra, it's a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. HTC U Ultra features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola One Vision has a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Vision also has more processing cores. Motorola One Vision features a better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a camera with way more MP.
The HTC U Ultra features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola One Vision features just a little bit longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.