Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision, getting a general score of 82.7 against 80.7. The LG G8X ThinQ design is just a little thinner but a little bit heavier than the Motorola One Vision, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ and Motorola One Vision both count with really similar screens, because although the LG G8X ThinQ has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display. LG G8X ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Vision features a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a larger aperture, a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.