Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Titan gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision's score of 80.7. The LG K92 design is newer and just a bit thinner than Motorola One Vision's, although it is heavier. Motorola One Vision and LG K92 feature quite similar processing units, and although the LG K92 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. LG K92 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size back camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera.
The LG K92 has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.