Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Mirror black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is a bit better than the LG Q70, getting an 80.7 score against 77.9. The Motorola One Vision is an older and a bit thicker device than the LG Q70, but Motorola could make it just a bit lighter anyway. The Motorola One Vision counts with a slightly better display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little better pixels number in each inch of display.
Motorola One Vision features a bit better processing unit than LG Q70. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Motorola One Vision takes just a bit better videos and photos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos, a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
The LG Q70 features a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.