Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision, with a global score of 81.2 against 80.7. LG V40 ThinQ's body is thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola One Vision, although both were only released with a few months difference. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better screen than Motorola One Vision, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit better number of pixels in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision counts with a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Vision, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola One Vision features just a little bit longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.