Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision, having a overall score of 87.1 against 80.7. The LG Velvet design has the same weight than the Motorola One Vision, but it's a bit thinner. LG Velvet counts with a little better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision has a little more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size camera sensor and a 48 MP back-facing camera, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger aperture.
The LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.