Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-09-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Glacier |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo's 78.8 score. Motorola One Vision is an older and way thicker phone than Microsoft Surface Duo, but Motorola managed to make it incredibly lighter anyway. Motorola One Vision and Microsoft Surface Duo have quite similar displays, because although the Microsoft Surface Duo has a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1800 x 2700 pixels.
Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo also has more RAM. The Motorola One Vision has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision shoots much better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a larger aperture and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Microsoft Surface Duo features just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.