Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision, with a general score of 85.3 against 80.7. Although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is noticeably heavier than Motorola One Vision, it's noticeably thinner and also incredibly newer. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a bit better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a better resolution of 1892 x 2688px and a really bigger screen.
Motorola One Vision features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with just a little better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has greater battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision has a better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.