Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than the Motorola One Vision, getting a score of 80.9 against 80.7. Even though Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit heavier than Motorola One Vision, it's just a little thinner and also notably newer. The Motorola One Vision counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola One Vision features a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much longer battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.