Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-15 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than Moto Z Force, having a general score of 80.7 against 75.8. Motorola One Vision's body is notably newer than Moto Z Force's, although it is a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Moto Z Force has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Moto Z Force features slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Vision, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Vision counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Vision also has more 2200 megahertz cores.
Motorola One Vision and Motorola Moto Z Force feature really similar batteries. Motorola One Vision counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.