Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2019-05-15 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. Even though Motorola One Vision is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's incredibly heavier and incredibly thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels count in each inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One Vision, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One Vision has longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh. The Motorola One Vision takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images, a much bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.