Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| 2019-05-15 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Play, getting an 80.7 score against 77.4. Even though Motorola One Vision is newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it is noticeably thicker and heavier. The Moto Z2 Play and Motorola One Vision both have really similar processing units, they have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One Vision has a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a little greater pixel amount in each inch of screen. The Motorola One Vision counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play features a bit more storage for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola One Vision features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.