Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper, with an 80.7 score against 79.8. Even when the Motorola One Vision and Motorola One Hyper were released with only a couple months difference, the Motorola One Vision is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The Motorola One Vision features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher display density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520.
Motorola One Vision has a bit faster processor than Motorola One Hyper. They have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision features a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a camera with a lot lower 48 mega pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Motorola One Hyper features just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper features just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.