Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Ocean |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 general score. OPPO Find X2 Pro's body is newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola One Vision. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a bit bigger display, a better 1440 x 3168px resolution and a little bit greater screen density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the same video quality and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher video frame rates and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.