Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A21, getting an 80.7 score against 76.1. The Motorola One Vision design is a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A21, but it's a little bit thicker and was released about 14 months before. The Motorola One Vision features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per display inch and a way better 1080 x 2520 resolution.
The Galaxy A21 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola One Vision has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Vision captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures, a back camera with much more mega pixels, a way bigger back camera sensor and a much better video quality. Samsung Galaxy A21 counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.