Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22, having a score of 80.7 against 76.1. Motorola One Vision's construction is a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A22, but it's a bit thicker and was released 2 years before. The Motorola One Vision counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
The Motorola One Vision has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22. Motorola One Vision shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.