Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G design is incredibly newer than the Motorola One Vision's, although it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola One Vision and Samsung Galaxy A22 5G count with very similar processing units, they have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. Motorola One Vision features a little bit more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a way better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger camera aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.