Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with an 80.7 score against 79.9. The Motorola One Vision design is a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it's a bit thicker and was released many years before. The Motorola One Vision counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Motorola One Vision features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser megapixels resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has a much better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.