Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is slightly better than Galaxy A30, having a score of 80.7 against 79.6. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Motorola One Vision is a thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A30. Motorola One Vision has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number in each inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
Motorola One Vision has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola One Vision takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The Motorola One Vision counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A30 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.