Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-15 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Blue and Brown | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A34 is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision, having an 82.9 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy A34 is a notably thinner and way lighter phone than Motorola One Vision. Motorola One Vision has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel quantity in each screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
The Motorola One Vision has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A34 features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Vision. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
Motorola One Vision takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.