Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, with a score of 80.7 against 79.4. The Motorola One Vision body is lighter than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before. The Motorola One Vision has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Motorola One Vision captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a back camera with lesser megapixels resolution and a smaller sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola One Vision has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.