Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A42 has a general score of 87, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 general score. The Galaxy A42 design has the same thickness than the Motorola One Vision, but it is just a little heavier. Galaxy A42's processing unit is very similar to the Motorola One Vision one, both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola One Vision features a brighter display than Galaxy A42, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a much better amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A42 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A42 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A42 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One Vision features a bit better camera than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.